User interface for use with a search engine for searching financial related documents

ABSTRACT

A method for rendering context based information on a user interface includes receiving a user request to extract the context based information from a database. The database includes a plurality of documents and the request includes at least one search criteria required to determine a context of the user request. The method includes generating a list of documents corresponding to the context of the user request and rendering on a viewing portion of the user interface the list of documents corresponding to the context of the user request.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.17/384,075 entitled “SERVER WITH ASSOCIATED REMOTE DISPLAY HAVINGIMPROVED ORNAMENTALITY AND USER FRIENDLINESS FOR SEARCHING DOCUMENTSASSOCIATED WITH PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANIES”, filed on Jul. 23, 2021,which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/244,994entitled “USER INTERFACE FOR USE WITH A SEARCH ENGINE FOR SEARCHINGFINANCIAL RELATED DOCUMENTS”, filed on Apr. 30, 2021, which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/107,148 entitled“USER INTERFACE FOR USE WITH A SEARCH ENGINE FOR SEARCHING FINANCIALRELATED DOCUMENTS”, filed on Nov. 30, 2020, which is a continuation ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/891,254 entitled “USER INTERFACE FORUSE WITH A SEARCH ENGINE FOR SEARCHING FINANCIAL RELATED DOCUMENTS”,filed on Feb. 7, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,023,675 issued on Jun. 1,2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/820,507 entitled “USER INTERFACE FOR USE WITH SENTENCE LEVEL ANALYSISAND SEARCHING OF FINANCIAL RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLICLY TRADEDCOMPANIES”, filed on Nov. 22, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S.patent application Ser. No. 12/939,165 entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FORCONDUCTING CONTEXTUAL SENTENCE LEVEL DEEP SEARCH WITH FORWARD LOOKING,RECURRING, SUBJECTIVITY AND SENTIMENT”, filed on Nov. 3, 2010, whichclaims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 61/257,466 filed on Nov. 3, 2009. Each of theapplications referenced herein are incorporated by reference in theirentirety.

FIELD

The disclosure relates generally to a user interface for use with asearch engine for searching financial related documents.

BACKGROUND

Conventional web search engines return links to entire documents inresponse to a search query consisting of keywords or phrases given bythe user. In the financial domain, the end user is often a financialanalyst who is researching the information source and looking forspecific textual information within a specific contextual topic. Textsearch software is able to find specific keywords, but typically missesthe many synonyms and alternative expressions that the user was not ableto think about, or does not have time to go through one by one. Forexample, “sales growth” as a topic could be expressed as “revenueexpansion”, “increasing customer demand” or any number of tens or evenhundreds of combinations of synonyms, with phrases broken up within asentence or across multiple sentences. Searching for each of those termsor all of those terms at once is not practical, as it would take a lotof time, would require referral to synonyms and may not return some ormost of the actual sentences or paragraphs that one seeks. Traditionalsearch engines can therefore either miss the relevant and importantitems of interest, or bring too many documents that contain the samekeywords but in the wrong context, in effect rendering the searchuseless. Also, financial analysts are often evaluating whether the textexpressions are positive or negative for the company's stock price, buttraditional search engines do not allow the analyst to search for textthat is either positive or negative from the perspective of the price ofthe company's stock. In addition, the analyst would like to know if thestatement was made earlier, is a recurring statement and if it refers toan event in the future.

Thus, it is desirable to provide a method and a system for efficientlyconducting contextual, uniqueness or recurring, tense andsentiment-aware deep search within a document, and it is to this endthat the disclosure is directed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an implementation of a search systemfor efficiently conducting contextual and sentiment-aware deep searchwithin a piece of content;

FIG. 2 illustrates an overview of the deep search process;

FIG. 3 illustrates examples of the user interface of the deep searchsystem;

FIG. 4 illustrates more details of the deep search process in thefinancial domain;

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate an example of a user interface for the deepsearch system for an initial query and a list of results, respectively,in the financial industry;

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a sentiment heat map user interface ofthe deep search system;

FIG. 7 illustrates another example of a search results user interface ofthe deep search system;

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a search results user interface of thedeep search system, where the viewing interface allows the user tocompare documents side by side;

FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate portions of a document highlighted that ismade possible by the deep search system; and

FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate an example of a multi-document summary thatis made possible by the deep search system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ONE OR MORE EMBODIMENTS

The disclosure is particularly applicable to a web-based client serverarchitecture deep search system and method for the financial industryand it is in this context that the disclosure will be described. It willbe appreciated, however, that the system and method in accordance withthe invention has much greater utility since it can be used forsearching in other industries or with other types of pieces of content(such as the legal industry and legal documents, the medical industryand medical documents, etc.) and the system can be implemented usingother computer system architectures and the system is not limited to anyparticular computer architecture. For illustration purposes, the deepsearch system and method implemented in the financial industry is nowdescribed in more detail.

The system and method may be used to perform a textual search across acollection of documents in one or more electronic data sources, in thefinancial domain, over time, guided by concepts and scenariospre-defined by financial experts. The system includes a contextextraction engine that will a) recognize semantically defined unique andrecurring scenarios within the textual material, consisting of a partialor whole sentence or multiple sentences, b) analyze and classify eachscenario based on tense recognizing linguistic rules and naturallanguage processing techniques, c) analyze sentiment and subjectivity todetermine if the scenario is objective or subjective and d) determinethe polarity and strength of sentiment relative to the company releasingthe textual information and the likely impact on its stock price or theprice of its other securities. The sentiment, subjectivity, the polarityand strength of the sentiment and the impact of the information may bestored as metadata associated with each piece of content. Based on thismetadata, the system enables sophisticated searching within and acrosspieces of content, such as documents, SEC or other regulatory filings,transcripts of investor calls and presentations, videos, blogs, postsand the like, to find the specific information that the user is lookingfor. The system also scores companies in real-time on a continuous scalefrom negative to neutral to positive, and enables a user to rank andscreen companies to generate new investment ideas and make betterinvestment decisions. Now, an example of an implementation of the searchsystem is described in more detail.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an implementation of a search system 20for efficiently conducting contextual and sentiment-aware deep searchwithin a piece of content, such as a document, a piece of text, a blog,a posting and the like. The system may be implemented as a client/servertype architecture as shown in FIG. 1, but may also be implemented usingother architectures, such as cloud computing, software as a servicemodel, a mainframe/terminal model, a stand-alone computer model, aplurality of lines of code on a computer readable medium that can beloaded onto a computer system, a plurality of lines of code downloadableto a computer and the like which are within the scope of the disclosure.

The system 20 may be one or more computing devices 22 (such as computingdevices 22 a, 22 b, . . . , 22 n) that connect to, communicate withand/or exchange data over a link 24 to a search system 26 that interactwith each other to provide the contextual and sentiment-aware deepsearch within a piece of content. Each computing device may be aprocessing unit based device with sufficient processing power,memory/storage and connectivity/communications capabilities to connectto and interact with the system 26. For example, each computing device22 may be an Apple iPhone or iPad product, a Blackberry or Nokiaproduct, a mobile product that executes the Android operating system, apersonal computer, a tablet computer, a laptop computer and the like andthe system is not limited to operate with any particular computingdevice. The link 26 may be any wired or wireless communications linkthat allows the one or more computing devices and the system 26 tocommunicate with each other. In one example, the link may be acombination of wireless digital data networks that connect to thecomputing devices and the Internet. The search system 26 may beimplemented as one or more server computers (all located at onegeographic location or in disparate locations) that execute a pluralityof lines of computer code to implement the functions and operations ofthe search system as described below in more detail. Alternatively, thesearch system 26 may be implemented as a hardware unit in which thefunctions and operations of the back end system are programmed into ahardware system. In one implementation, the one or more server computersmay use 4-core Intel® processors, run the Linux operating system, andexecute Java, Ruby, Regular Expression, Flex 4.0, SQL etc.

In the implementation shown in FIG. 1, each computing device 22 mayfurther comprise a display 30 a and a browser application 30 b so thatthe display 30 a can display web pages generated by the search system 26and the user can fill in forms to provide search queries and the like tothe search system 26. The browser application 30 b may be a plurality oflines of computer code executed by a processing unit of the computingdevice. Each computing device 22 may also have the usual components of acomputing device such as one or more processing units, memory, permanentstorage, wireless/wired communication circuitry, an operating system,etc.

In the implementation shown in FIG. 1, the search system 26 may furthercomprise a web server 40 (that may be software based or hardware based)that allows each computing device to connect to and interact with thesearch system 26 such as sending web pages and receiving informationfrom the computing devices and a typical operating system 42 that isexecuted by one or more processing units that are part of the searchsystem implementation. The search system 26 may further comprise acontent extraction unit/engine 44, a linguistic analysis and word/phrasetagging unit 45, a sentiment analyzer 46, a search engine 47 and a store48, that may be implemented as a software based or hardware baseddatabase, that may store the pieces of content associated with thesystem, the metadata generated by the search system for each piece ofcontent, user preferences and the like. The content extractionengine/unit 44 may a) recognize semantically defined scenarios withinthe textual material, consisting of a partial or whole sentence ormultiple sentences. The linguistic unit 45 analyzes and classifies eachscenario based on linguistic rules and natural language processingtechniques to determine subjectivity that are described below. Thesentiment analyzer 46 analyzes sentiment and subjectivity to determineif the scenario is objective or subjective and determines the polarityand strength of sentiment of the sentence, paragraph or appropriate partof the piece of content relative to the company releasing the textualinformation and the likely impact on its stock price or the price of itsother securities. The search engine 47 can perform searches based on themetadata, generate content to be displayed on the user interface of thesystem as well as generate reports of the system that are describedbelow in more detail. In one implementation, the search engine may bethe SOLR search engine which is open source enterprise search platformfrom the Apache Lucene project (additional information about SOLR can befound at http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ which is incorporated herein byreference.) The store 48 also contains an archive of “raw” pieces ofcontent (unprocessed or tagged) and tagged piece of content. The userinterface of the search system (implemented as a user interfaceunit/portion) allows a user to conduct topical and sentiment filterbased deep searches as described below in more detail.

FIG. 2 illustrates an overview of the deep search process 50. In theprocess, the search system receives feeds, that may be real-time, ofpieces of content (52) such as financial documents including 10K, 10Q orother SEC filings, or investor conference call transcripts, in thefinancial example. The content extractor unit of the system cleans theincoming pieces of content and normalizes the pieces of content (54).The content extractor unit of the system also extracts zones (particularsections of a document such as header, body, exhibits, MDA, andFootnotes in SEC filing documents) and sentences so that unique,meaningful information is separated from recurring or other boilerplateinformation during natural language processing. Often financial filingscontain a large portion of recurring text that is repeated from theprior quarter, and this is typically less interesting to investors thannew statements. In the content extractor unit and linguistic unit of thesystem, using thousands of structured concepts and scenarios definedthrough careful expert analysis, semantic tags are assigned bylinguistic and machine learning processes trained by domain experts(56). The linguistic unit also discerns the topic of the content usingspecial linguistic rules which is different from traditional searchengines where a search is performed using word and phrases withoutcontextual understanding of the text. For example, the linguisticanalysis unit tags sentences based on their tense, to determine whetherthey talk about something that happened in the past, is continuing, oris expected to happen in the future. This is accomplished through acombination of linguistic analysis and domain-based language models thatunderstand, for example, that a noun phrase like “deferred expenses”implies something about the future. In the system described here, thecustom linguistic rules specifically designed for the financial domain,provide highly specialized and accurate context.

The sentiment analyzer unit of the search system then analyzes eachpiece of text for subjectivity, performs textual scenario matching andfilters the subjective sentences and assigns appropriate polarity basedon supervised training rules, by deciding if the particular sentence orparagraph is favorable or unfavorable to the price of the asset in thecase of the financial industry example (58,60). Examples of thepolarities (negative, neutral and/or positive scenarios) are shown inFIG. 2.

The sentence or paragraph extracted from the piece of content may bemarked with the topic tags, polarity tags, index markers, sentimentvalues etc. and stored in the store 48 that is coupled to the contextsearch engine, the sentiment engine and the linguistic components. Thetraditional sentiment analysis is focused on the document level, helpingusers to find whole documents that in the aggregate have a positive ornegative tone, as opposed to the sentence or paragraph level where thetopic of interest is located. For example, the document level sentimentscores may be computed based on the sentence level scores as a netsentiment percentage of the total possible count. For example, Number ofpositive statements—Number of negative statements divided by the totalnumber of statements may be used to determine sentiment score of thedocument, although other methods may be used to determine the sentimentscore for the document. In the system described here, the sentiment tagsand the topic tags at the sentence, sub-sentence and/or paragraph levelprovide the user with granular search capabilities and let them find therelevant text that can explain or help predict price changes for a givenasset. The search system may then store the final results of all thetagged information in the store 48 associated with the search system.

The system presents a user interface to the user (See FIG. 3 forexample), in which the user interface may provide areading/browsing/searching user interface 62 described below in moredetail, a heat map user interface 64 described below in more detail andan aggregated sentiment user interface 66 described below in moredetail. Thus, the user interface presents the subjective categoriesrelated to financial concepts (in the financial industry example beingused for illustration purposes) along with the sentiment categories. Theuser interface program controls the context search engine by directingthe sentiment and contextual topic analyzing subsystems to extractrelevant information and return the results back to the user's machine.The information extraction based on the user's preferences may beperformed at periodic intervals as new files show up at the datasources. During a search operation, the search agent reviews the textobtained from one or more information sources, identifies the documentor documents relevant to the query. Then it performs the context andsentiment extraction at the sentence, paragraph, or at appropriategranular level to find the text portions that match the stated request,highlights the sentiment appropriately, filters or underlines thesentences that match the topic(s), and brings back the result in an easyto read format to the user. The users may be given the choice to quicklydrill down to the specific portions and find out the sentiment level,with matching topics and retrieve relevant text that enables them tomake better investment decisions in the financial industry example beingused for illustration purposes.

FIG. 4 illustrates more details of the deep search process 50 in thefinancial domain. The process shown in FIG. 4 may be performed for eachdocument/piece of content. In FIG. 4, some of the processes are the sameas those shown in FIG. 2 above. Thus, in the financial domain, theretrieving/downloading process 52 may involve the daily or intra-daydownload or other periodic retrieval of financial documents, such as 10Kand 10Q documents from the SEC, which are processed by the system.

Once the financial documents are retrieved, the system performs a datacleansing process 62 in which the system, among other things, removingextra tags, removing styles, removing extra HTML code and reformattingthe financial document as HTML without tags. In addition, for examplefor SEC packages of documents, the system may extract the HTML and textdocuments from the SEC package and append them into one HTML document.In more detail, the document is received as an HTML formatted documentand plain text documents. In order to identify sentences of text in thedocuments, the system determines what chunks of text are usefulstatements, where a sentence starts and ends and how HTML may alter thedocument. In particular, to determine what text chunks are realstatements that state something about a matter of affairs, such as:ComEd has no remaining costs to be recognized related to the rate reliefcommitment as of Sep. 30, 2010, as compared to text chunks that aretitles, page footers and headers, such as: Table of Contents or (Dollarsin millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted), the contentextracting unit uses a combination of sentence features, such as HTMLtags, end-of-sentence punctuation signs, and length thresholds ofsentences (in number of words and characters), to separate usefulcontent from the extraneous content. To determine where a sentencebegins and ends, the content extraction unit splits sentences atpunctuation signs, but takes abbreviations and acronyms into account,such as Mr., Inc., and U.S. If a document is HTML, sentences can usuallybe expected to occur entirely within one pair of enclosing tags, such asbegin and end of paragraph: <p> . . . </p>. There may be multiplesentences within one paragraph, but sentences are not usually split overmultiple paragraphs.

However, if a sentence is split over a page break, or if the document isplain text without any HTML formatting, the system concatenates chunksof text to reconstruct the paragraphs in the text by using someheuristics based on the spacing of the text and the occurrence of pagefooter and header clues, so as not to erroneously concatenate text thatdoes not belong together, such the end of a paragraph and a followingsection title. When the particular document is split into sentences,each sentence is saved as plain text under TxtData/and the document issaved as HTML with each sentence embedded with <span> tags, which areused by the search system to highlight sentences when the sentences aredisplayed to the user.

Once the extraneous content in the document is removed, the contentextraction unit extracts the key sentences/portions in the piece ofcontent (64) (such as the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MDA)portions of an SEC filing). An SEC filing contains different sections,such as a document header, document body, and exhibits section. Withinthe body and exhibits, there are subsections, such as the Management'sDiscussion and Analysis (MD&A) and the Notes to the FinancialStatements. The location of these sections are identified by acombination of regular expression patterns, and some information of thesize and order of sections in the document, and some excluding patternsthat disqualify matching patterns that occur in the wrong context, suchas in the table of contents. The system thus extracts these key portionsof the document.

The content extraction unit may also extract recurring/boilerplatesentences in the content (66) (such as sentences that are the same as inprior documents for each asset in an SEC filing).

As companies file on a quarterly basis, typically some of the text theysubmit is repeated from earlier reports. The content extraction unitidentifies the recurring statements and indicate that they are “lessinteresting” than the new statements by coloring the recurringstatements grey in the user interface when shown to the user and bystoring them in the store 48 with an indicating that they are recurringstatements. Recurring statements are identified by comparing eachstatement in the current filing to all statements in the previous filingof the company (through the use of the store 48) and a comparison isperformed on normalized statements, where some stop words and whitespacecharacters are ignored. Thus, the system also extracts these recurringportions of the document from the document and store them in the store48. In one implementation, information about all filings that arecurrently in the system for a company (in the financial example) arestored in a FORM_TBL table in the store (that may be implemented usingMySql) and the recurring sentences are tagged in the files in TxtData/.As in the following steps, each file is read from TxtData/, modified,and written back to TxtData/.

Once the various sentences have been extracted from the document,sentiment, topic, recurring/boilerplate classification and tagging (68)are performed in order to tag and classify each sentence in the documentincluding tags for sentiment, topics, tense, tone, etc. Using a topictaxonomy that is specific to the industry or field in which thedocuments pertain, the search system identifies which topics are presentin the sentences (such as Revenue, Cash flow, Risks, etc for thefinancial industry). The search system may also perform part-of-speechtagging using a linguistic tagger to identify the parts of speech of thewords in the sentences (nouns, verbs, etc.) and the results may be savedunder PosTagged/. The system may also identify sentences that areforward looking (containing present and future tense, plans, intentions,. . . ) where part-of-speech tags in combination with industry knowledgebased taxonomies are used here for disambiguation (forward lookingstatements in SEC filings). Boilerplate sentences that typically occurin all filings (such as those explaining what “Forward lookingstatements” mean) may be similarly recognized and tagged for removal.

The range topics for a particular industry are selected since sometopics are of particular interest to financial analysts, such as Sales,Orders and Backlog, Same Store Sales or Net Interest Income. To tag thetopics for a particular industry, like the financial industry, thesystem provides key topic search queries that have been predesigned byfinancial experts and that identify statements in the text that containreferences to the topics. For example, the Orders and Backlog topic maycorrespond to the following example search query:

([orders] or [sales order] or [services order] or FOLLOW(5, [order],cancellation) or [order rate] or [commercial order] or [delivery order]or [order amounts] or [order activity] or backlog

or [task order] or [signings] or [order value] or NEAR(5, [order],customer) or [customer order] or NEAR(5, [order], delay) or

NEAR(5, [order], cancellation) or FOLLOW(5, time, [order]) or [changeorder] or [order volumes] or [order volume] or [ordering patterns] or[order is taken] or [order size] or FOLLOW(5, [order], shipped) orFOLLOW(5, return, [order]) or [product order] or FOLLOW(5, convert,[order]) or [subscription order] or [order growth] or FOLLOW(5,completion, [order]) or [average order] or [order exists] or [new order]or [order book] or [firm order] or bookings) and not ([auction ratesecurities] or [court] or [courts] or [court's] or [obligations] or[commitments] or [in order to])

This query contains the boolean operators or, and, and not that combinedifferent search terms into one query. Words or phrases enclosed insquare brackets are literal matches; e.g., [orders] matches the word“orders” (irrespective of character case). Words without square bracketsare stemmed before matching; e.g., customer matches any inflected formof “customer”: “customer, customers, customer's”. The special functionsFOLLOW and NEAR indicate a set of words that have to occur within awindow of predefined size, allowing for stray words within the windowthat do not match any of the words in the query; e.g., FOLLOW(5,[order], cancellation) indicates that the word “cancellation” may occurat a maximum distance of 5 words from the word “order”, in the givenorder: “order” before “cancellation”. The function NEAR works as FOLLOWbut the order of the words within the clause is free.

An example of the results for tagging sentences for boiler, forwardlooking statements and topic may be:

The document title/filing: 0001193125-10-241317.txt Company:

Google Inc

Form type: 10Q

Filed on: 20101029

Sentence: On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, includingthose related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fairvalues of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, usefullives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values ofstock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, amongothers.

Sentence id: 112773 is boiler: yes

zone: footnotes, document body Forward Looking

Sentence: yes

Topics: Accounting Policies; Working Capital; Revenue; Capex &Depreciation;

Capital Liquidity; Profit & Costs

Sentence: A discount factor was applied over these estimated cash flowsof our ARS, which is calculated based on the interpolated forward swapcurve adjusted by up to 1,700 basis points to reflect the current marketconditions for instruments with similar credit quality at the date ofthe valuation and further adjusted by up to 400 basis points to reflecta discount for the liquidity risk associated with these investments dueto the lack of an active market.

sentence id: 243505 is boiler: yes

zone: footnotes, document body

fls: yes

topics: Cash Flow; Accounting Policies; Derivatives and Hedging;Revenue; Capital Liquidity;

Risks

Sentence: For all acquisitions completed during the nine months endedSep. 30, 2010, patents and developed technology have a weighted-averageuseful life of 4.1 years, customer relationships have a weighted-averageuseful life of 3.3 years and tradenames and other have aweighted-average useful life of 4.0 years.

sentence id: 384406 is boiler: no

zone: footnotes, document body

fls: no

topics: Revenue

As described above, the linguistic unit also discerns the topic of thecontent using special linguistic rules. The linguistic rules may be, forexample:

-   -   @MACRO@ @V-MODAL@        -   (could|may|might|must|shall|should|will|wo|would)/MD            Or the following macros:    -   @MACRO@ @@ ( ) //Left start edge of expression    -   @MACRO@ @@ ( ) //Right end edge of expression    -   @ @MACRO@ \w [\a-\z\A-\Z\_\0-\9] //A word character    -   @ @MACRO@ @VB@ (\w+/VB) //Head verb base form        The natural language processing may include, for example:    -   We add linguistic knowledge to the statements by using a        part-of-speech tagger or syntactic parser. An example of a        statement with part-of-speech tags is:    -   The/DT latter/JJaction/NN would/MD cause/VB some/DT delay/NN        in/IN the/DT effectiveness/NN of/IN rates/NNS that/WDT might/MD        otherwise/RB become/VB effective/JJ in/IN June/NNP 2011/CD./.    -   This linguistic annotation is used in a consequent step that        assigns tense to the statement. This means that we identify        whether the statement is forward-looking, referring to a future        event.    -   The system defines macros for some frequently occurring        constructs, e.g., a macro for modal and auxiliary verbs examples        of which are described above for the linguistic rules.    -   The macros are regular expressions containing information on the        words and the part-of-speech tags of the words in a statement.        The macros can be used in rules, such as in the following rule:    -   @@ @ADVP@? @V-MODAL@ @ADVP@? @VB@ @ADVP@? @@

For fast matching, the regular expressions are compiled into FiniteState Automata using finite-state algebra.

The search system may also use a syntactic parser, e.g., a dependencyparser. For example, the dependency parse of the sentence:

The company has available a $750 million bank credit facility thatexpires in December 2010.

looks like this:

det(company-2, The-1)

nsubj(has-3, company-2)

dep(has-3, available-4) det(facility-11, a-5)

num(facility-11, $-6)

number($-6, 750-7)

number($-6, million-8)

nn(facility-11, bank-9)

nn(facility-11, credit-10)

dep(available-4, facility-11)

nsubj(expires-13, that-12)

rcmod(facility-11, expires-13) prep(expires-13, in-14)

pobj(in-14, December-15) num(December-15, 2010-16)

Each dependency consists of a relation (e.g., det=determiner) between ahead word (e.g., company) and its dependent (e.g, The). Each word tokenhas an ID number attached to it (e.g., company-2) by which it ispossible to uniquely identify that word occurrence; this is necessary ifthe same word occurs multiple times in the sentence, in differentsyntactic positions.

Rules can be expressed using dependencies. For instance, the sentenceabove is classified as forward-looking because the dependencyprep(expires-13, in-14) matches the rule:

prep(({V}(expire|expires|expiring)@ID@),(at|before|in|on|within)@ID@)//expireson

Example of Results

-   -   The/DT latter/JJ action/NN would/MD cause/MB some/DT delay/NN        in/IN the/DT effectiveness/NN of/IN rates/NNS that/WDT might/MD        otherwise RB become/VB effective/JJ in/INJune/NNP 2011/CD./.    -   The above rule determines that the statement “The latter action        would cause some delay in the effectiveness of rates that might        otherwise become effective in June 2011.” is forward-looking,        because it contains the constructs: would/MD cause/VB and        might/MD otherwise RB become/VB.

The sentiment analyzer unit may classify sentences in a document/pieceof content as objective (=neutral sentiment) vs. subjective (=positiveor negative sentiment). Sentiment extraction involves three steps:

1. Feature extraction: Terms, phrases, or co-occurring words that arejudged to be relevant from the point of view of sentiment classificationare selected by a domain expert according to the approaches described inabove. Another alternative is using n-grams or a combination offeatures.2. Objective vs. subjective classification: Supervised machine learningis utilized to learn to distinguish between objective and subjectivestatements based on the features of step 1. The machine learningtechniques can be linear regression, Support Vector Machines, decisiontrees, or artificial neural networks, to name a few.3. Positive vs. negative classification: If the sentiment is in step 2is classified as subjective, then a further classifier classifies thestatements as positive or negative or neutral, based on pattern matchingagainst a large database of positive, negative and neutral textualfeatures built by financial domain experts. The open source SupportVector Machine algorithm (LibSVM) is trained based on the annotatorsresults by letting it figure out the key features that happen to affectthe predictions the most. This part of the algorithm is based on theopen source implementation. The features and the guidelines that drivethe annotations described earlier, determine the effectiveness of theclassification results and thus distinguish our sentiment predictionfrom other approaches that happen to use the SVM or other machinelearning techniques.

In some embodiments of the system, processes 2 and 3 above may becombined into one single machine learning step. Consider, for instance,the following rule-based approaches to feature extraction for sentiment:

a. A rule is expressed as an accurate search query with Boolean logic,as described above:

FEATURE_OUR_PROJECTION.

FOLLOW(3, [our] or [its] or company or management, estimate orestimation or target or forecast or forecasted or [projected] or[projection] or [we project] or [company projects] or [managementprojects] or [we estimate] or [company estimates] or [managementestimates]) and not(FOLLOW(3, sales or selling or marketing, expense orexpenditure or cost)) and not(FOLLOW(3, require, us, to, estimate) orFOLLOW(3, estimate, that, have, realized) or FOLLOW(3, we, review, our))and not(FOLLOW(3, tax, rate) or FOLLOW(3, fair, value) or FOLLOW(3,ongoing or going, basis) or FOLLOW(3, continually or continuously,evaluates) or FOLLOW(3, useful, life) or FOLLOW(3, in, making, its) orFOLLOW(3, realizable, value) or FOLLOW(3, discounted, cash, flow))b. A rule is expressed as a regular expression taking into account boththe surface forms of words and potentially their part-of-speech tags, asdescribed above:FEATURE_REVENUE_VOLUMES_REVENUE_GROWTH:@@ (revenue|sales|royalty|business) @WORD6@ (growth|grow|expansion|expand|increase|increasing|enhancement|improvement|improving|improve) @@,where the macro @WORD6@ corresponds to a sequence of stray words,minimum zero and maximum six words:@MACRO@ @WORD6@ @WORD@? @WORD@? @WORD@?@WORD@? @WORD@? @WORD@?

A rule is expressed as one or multiple dependency relations betweenwords.

c. If a full syntactic parser is not available or not a feasiblesolution (e.g., due to heavy computational requirements), shallow parsescan be produced using a set of cascaded rules that are applied on apart-of-speech tagged sentence. Shallow parses are parses of chunks orphrases within a sentence, not necessarily covering the syntax of theentire sentence.

-   -   If we start with the following part-of-speech tagged sentence:        The/DT company/NN has/VBZ available/JJ a/DT $/$750/CD million/CD        bank/NN credit/NN facility/NN that/WDT expires/VBZ in/IN        December/NNP 2010/CD./.        We get the following shallow parse:        <NP>The company</NP>        <VP>has</VP>available/JJ        <NP>a $750 million bank credit facility</NP>        <NP>that</NP>        <VP>expires</VP>        <PP>in December 2010</PP>    -   ./.        Which contains the chunks:        DP 62 0        <DP>The</DP>        DP 62 1<DP>a</DP>        TIME-NP 78 2 num(December,2010)<TIME-NP>December 2010</TIME-NP>        NUM 85 3 number(million, 750)<NUM>$750 million</NUM>        NOM 87 4 nn(facility, bank credit)<NOM>bank credit        facility</NOM>        NOM 101 5 num(bank credit facility, 750 million)<NOM>$750        million bank        credit facility</NOM>        NP 108 6 det($750 million bank credit facility|a)    -   <NP>a $750 million bank credit facility</NP>        NP 109 7 det(company, The)<NP>The company</NP>        PP 119 8 pobj (in, December)<PP>in December 2010</PP>        VP 148 9<VP>has</VP>        VP 148 10<VP>expires</VP>        NP 150 11<NP>that</NP>

To extract sentiment topic features, dependency rules can be writtenthat operate on the dependencies discovered by the shallow parser.

As a result of the processes above, the store 48 has a plurality ofsentences for each document with each sentence or other portion of thedocument having one or more topics tags and sentiments associated witheach portion of the document. This combined data is them used to performthe deep searches as described below and generate the user interfacesthat are described below.

Once the tagging and classification has been completed, the sentences,sentiments of the sentences and other asset specific information forqualitative, trend and heat map analysis may be loaded into a database(70) so that for example, the heat map as shown in FIG. 7 may begenerated by the system.

In addition, the sentences and key paragraphs may be loaded into a SOLRdatabase (72) during indexing so that the search engine can performs itsdeep searches based on the portions of the documents, the topic tags andthe sentiments. In more detail, XML is created that corresponds to theSOLR entries, both on sentence level (TopicXml) and filing level(FullFilingXml). In addition, the data is posted to SOLR, which makesthe filing appear in the web application. For historical reasons, thesentence level info is stored in SolrTopic, and the filing level info isstored in SolrMda. In addition, the system also highlights sentiments inthe sentences of the document (74) for later viewing as described belowin which the sentiments are “tagged” to the sentences and some HTML isadded to reflect the highlighting.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate an example of a search user interface 80 forthe deep search system for an initial query and a list of results,respectively, in the financial industry. The user interface has a finddocuments portion 82 that allows the user to specify search criteria forthe search by sectors, industries, portfolios, stocks, marketcapitalization ranges, date ranges, keywords, saved queries and thelike. The user interface also has a viewing portion 84 that in FIG. 5Ahas a form to enter specific search criteria and in FIG. 5B has a listof responsive documents based on a search. The user interface 80 mayalso have a topics portion 86 that lists the topics associated with theparticular subject matter area, the financial industry documents in thisexample. When the system is used in a different subject matter area,such as the law, the system would like a different set of topics in thelist. The list of topics portions can be used at any time during theviewing of documents to change the topics of interest. Any time that theuser changes the topics, the viewing portion 84 is dynamically updatedas the user changes the topics, for example. In FIG. 5B, if the userselects one of the returned documents shown in the viewing portion 84,the user interface displays the extracted sentences and sentiments foreach extracted sentence as shown in FIG. 6. As shown in FIG. 6, thedifferent sentiments of the sentences are shown in different colors (redfor negative sentiments 90, green 92 for positive sentiments and plainblack/uncolored for neutral sentiment statements.) Specific cue wordsused in determining sentiment, topic or tense may also be underlined orotherwise marked (although none are shown in the example). In addition,since the system extracts recurring sentences, the user interface mayalso shown recurring sentences as grayed out (although none are shown inFIG. 6 since the filter to hide boiler sentences has been activated inFIG. 6.) The search system viewing as shown in FIG. 6 allows the user torapidly review a long document, such as a new SEC filing, and quicklysee sentences in the document that are positive, negative or neutral.For the financial world, this deep search engine allows the user toquickly review company SEC filings and determine the effect of thesentences in the filing on the stock price of the company, for example,or to screen a large number of filings for new negative or positivestatements on a given topic of interest, where the topic of interestcould be “all new negative forward looking statements made by large-capretail companies in the most recent quarter about their sales in Asia”(which would be done by appropriate selection of filters and searcheswithin the example system).

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a sentiment heat map user interface 100of the deep search system. Due to the documents having sentences taggedwith sentiment, the sentiment heat map is able to calculate and show thesentiment by industry (such as oil 101, integrated circuits (chips) 102and the beer industry 104) or other criteria, the colors show the levelof positive or negative or neutral outlook for the companies in theindustry and the size of rectangle in any one industry corresponds tothe market value of the company in the industry in which the largerrectangle indicates are larger market value company. For example, in theoil industry, the larger market value companies have negativesentiments, but a smaller company has a positive sentiment as shown bythe smaller green rectangle 1011. In the sentiment heat map, the usercan click on any rectangle, see the company name and then select thatcompany to see its documents and the sentiments of the sentences in thedocuments for the company that led the system to calculate a givensentiment score and display it on the heatmap. The user can alterselections such as the recurring, topic and tense filters, which aredynamically reflected in the heatmap display, with a new sentimentnumber calculated for all the companies shown.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a search results user interface of thedeep search system, where the viewing interface allows the user tocompare documents side by side that is made possible by the deep searchsystem and processes described above.

The processes of the deep search system and method described above canbe used to generate reports for the user that help the user quicklyreview a quick “cliff notes” summary of the document or a range ofdocuments because the system as described above can identify relevantsentences within a large document, or many documents, based on theuser's custom criteria (e.g. topic, tense, tone, recurring, keywordsearch, industries, market caps, etc. . . . ), and create the documentsummary of summary of a range of documents. Thus, using the system, auser can skim-read through a pre-highlighted document or multipledocuments, focusing on what he had pre-defined as important (and whatthe system thus highlighted), as opposed to having to read everything.The deep search system may further have a report generator unit thatgenerates reports, such as those shown in FIGS. 9A-10B below based onthe processes above.

FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate portions of a document highlighted that ismade possible by the deep search system. In particular, the document isan SEC filing for a company and the system has modified the document tomake it easier for a user to quickly review. Using the contentextraction, linguistic/tagging process and the sentiment determinationprocess described above, the system highlights different sentences ofthe document. For example, the system highlight one or more sentence(s)110 in yellow that match a user's indication of interest in the sentencebased on various criteria but are recurring sentences and shown by thegrayed out text, highlights one or more sentence(s) 112 is blue that areidentified by the system but are recurring sentences and shown by thegrayed out text, highlights one or more sentence(s) in yellow that matcha user's indication of interest in the sentence based on variouscriteria and are not recurring sentences and highlights one or moresentence(s) in blue that are identified by the system and are notrecurring sentences. In the example in FIGS. 9A and 9B, the user searchterm was for “new forward looking statements about revenue”—i.e.incorporating both topic and tense into same query, while filtering (orgraying) out recurring statements (i.e. those that were simply repeatedfrom the prior filing). The value of this is to help the user quicklyskim-read through a pre-highlighted document, focusing on what he hadpre-defined as important (and what the system thus highlighted), asopposed to having to read everything.

FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate an example of a multi-document summary thatis made possible by the deep search system. Traditional search enginesreturn full documents that had something potentially relevant in them,and a user has to spend endless amounts of time clicking through thosedocuments to see if there is something potentially useful. However,using the processes of the deep search system, the user can have acustom report generated as shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B which is auser-defined summary of what a selection of companies said about a topicof interest to the user. The example in FIGS. 10A and 10B shows whatchip makers said about inventory during the past quarter, an indicatorof the business cycle in that industry. As shown, the portions of thedocuments for each company are shown side-by-side 120-124 with the ofinterest sentences (based on the user's expressed interest) arehighlighted so that the user can quickly review the documents of thethree companies in the same industry.

In an implementation of the deep search system, the content extractionprocesses may include a rule parsing algorithm that emulate keyfunctions such as NEAR, PHRASE, FOLLOW, FUZZY, EXACT, DICTIONARY etcwith the rules being expressed as XML and interpreted by our ruleprocess execution engine wherein the rules are applied to extract thetopic features for each sentence. In the same implementation, thelinguistic process uses an open source finite state machine, regularexpression optimizers and PERL style Regular Expression generators. Inthe same implementation, the sentiment analyzer process uses acombination of linguistic rules and machine learning techniques such asSVM (Support Vector Machine) and Neural Network models. In the sentimentanalysis, the system is seeded with the topic features based on topicextracting rules and linguistic features based on shallow and some deepparsing algorithms. Then, the machine learning algorithm select theappropriate features based on human annotated sentences.

While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodimentof the invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the artthat changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from theprinciples and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is definedby the appended claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A system for rendering information from adatabase onto a user interface, the system comprising a server operableto: receiving a query from a user at a remote computer to search withinthe database, wherein the database comprises a plurality of financialdocuments associated with publicly traded companies within a pluralityof industries, wherein at least one document is generated by a publiclytraded company, wherein the user query includes: a first keyworddistinct from the publicly traded company, wherein a first similar topicis determined for the first keyword; and a second keyword distinct fromthe first keyword and the publicly traded company, wherein a secondsimilar topic is determined for the second keyword; a selected industryfrom the plurality of industries; executing a search based on the userquery to generate search results based on the first keyword, the firstsimilar topic, the second keyword, the second similar topic, and theselected industry; generating search results in response to executingthe search, wherein the search results include financial documentsassociated with the selected industry and that contain identifiedsnippets of text from within the financial documents, wherein theidentified snippets comprise a complete sentence, wherein the snippet oftext is identified when the first keyword or the first similar topicappears within a defined maximum distance from the second keyword or thesecond similar topic in a searched financial document including when thefirst similar topic appears within the defined maximum distance from thesecond similar topic in the searched financial document; and causing torender, on a viewing portion of the user interface, content from thegenerated search results, wherein the rendered content includes: a listof identified financial documents for selection by the user; a pluralityof the identified snippets for selection by the user, wherein theplurality of the identified snippets is displayed in response to aselection of a financial document by the user from the list ofidentified financial documents, wherein the plurality of the identifiedsnippets is from the user selected financial document; and textsurrounding and containing a user selected snippet from the userselected financial document, wherein the at least a portion of the userselected snippet is displayed within the text surrounding the userselected snippet.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the list ofidentified financial documents and plurality of identified snippets forselection by the user are each shown in distinct portions from oneanother of the user interface.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein thedefined maximum distance is adjustable.
 4. The system of claim 1,wherein a date associated with one or more of the financial documents isdisplayed in the list of identified financial documents.
 5. The systemof claim 1, wherein a type of financial document is one of a SEC orother regulatory filing, transcript of investor call or presentation. 6.The system of claim 1, wherein a further selection of a snippet by theuser from the plurality of identified snippets results in showing textsurrounding and containing the snippets in a distinct portion of theuser interface.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the publicly tradedcompany of the user query comprises an identifier of the publicly tradedcompany.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the rendered content includesa stock ticker or a name of a publicly traded company associated withthe list of identified financial documents.
 9. A method for renderinginformation from a database on a user interface of a remote computer,the method comprising: receiving a query from a user at a remotecomputer to search within the database, wherein the database comprises aplurality of financial documents associated with publicly tradedcompanies within a plurality of industries, wherein at least onedocument is generated by a publicly traded company, wherein the userquery includes: a first keyword distinct from the publicly tradedcompany, wherein a first similar topic is determined for the firstkeyword; and a second keyword distinct from the first keyword and thepublicly traded company, wherein a second similar topic is determinedfor the second keyword; a selected industry from the plurality ofindustries; executing a search based on the user query to generatesearch results based on the first keyword, the first similar topic, thesecond keyword, the second similar topic, and the selected industry;generating search results in response to executing the search, whereinthe search results include financial documents associated with theselected industry and that contain identified snippets of text fromwithin the financial documents, wherein the identified snippets comprisea complete sentence, wherein the snippet of text is identified when thefirst keyword or the first similar topic appears within a definedmaximum distance from the second keyword or the second similar topic ina searched financial document including when the first similar topicappears within the defined maximum distance from the second similartopic in the searched financial document; and causing to render, on aviewing portion of the user interface, content from the generated searchresults, wherein the rendered content includes: a list of identifiedfinancial documents for selection by the user; a plurality of theidentified snippets for selection by the user, wherein the plurality ofthe identified snippets is displayed in response to a selection of afinancial document by the user from the list of identified financialdocuments, wherein the plurality of the identified snippets is from theuser selected financial document; and text surrounding and containing auser selected snippet from the user selected financial document, whereinthe at least a portion of the user selected snippet is displayed withinthe text surrounding the user selected snippet.
 10. The method of claim9, wherein the defined maximum distance is adjustable.
 11. The method ofclaim 9, wherein a date associated with one or more of the financialdocuments is displayed in the list of identified financial documents.12. The method of claim 9, wherein a type of financial document is oneof a SEC or other regulatory filing, transcript of investor call orpresentation.
 13. The method of claim 9, wherein a further selection ofa snippet by the user from the plurality of identified snippets resultsin showing text surrounding and containing the snippets in a distinctportion of the user interface.
 14. The method of claim 9, wherein thepublicly traded company of the user query comprises an identifier of thepublicly traded company.
 15. The method of claim 9, wherein the renderedcontent includes a stock ticker or a name of a publicly traded companyassociated with the list of identified financial documents.